Measure reported readiness
Review your reported practices across acceptance criteria, regression testing, AI security, production monitoring, release evidence, RAG, and agents.
AI release readiness assessment
Score how exposed your system is, how strong your controls are, and how far the exposure runs ahead of the controls.
What you receive
Review your reported practices across acceptance criteria, regression testing, AI security, production monitoring, release evidence, RAG, and agents.
Connect the score to the lifecycle, users, data, architecture, and assurance practices selected in the assessment.
Receive focused validation priorities and questions to carry into release planning or a technical review.
What the assessment covers
The assessment scores the domains that apply to your system.
Preparing your personalized result
AI release readiness profile
Assurance maturity
Inherent exposure
Preliminary concern
Priority area for technical validation
Higher values indicate more structured and repeatable reported practices.
Recommended validation focus
A TestSavant.AI specialist can help determine which areas warrant technical validation against the real application, data, models, retrieval sources, tools, and workflows.
Use these questions to clarify scope, evidence, and release confidence with engineering, QA, security, and AI product stakeholders.
Inherent exposure uses lifecycle, user reach, data sensitivity, architecture, external access, production status, and high-impact agent actions where applicable.
Assurance maturity uses reported acceptance criteria, regression testing, AI security, production monitoring, release evidence, plus the RAG and agent domains where applicable.
Preliminary concern is calculated as 65% of inherent exposure plus 35% of the inverse of assurance maturity.
Enterprise Grade AI Testing and Guardrails for Generative AI and Agentic Applications